« Do more than patch Windows, patch Office as well | Main | Offline phishing: nasty attacks that phish with a fax »

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Survey of commercial firewall security features for IPv6

ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) is conducting a survey to collect information regarding the availability of IPv6 support among commercial firewalls and security systems.

This is an update of a survey SSAC conducted in 2007. The committee expects that the responses will provide the community with some insight into the ease or challenges it will face as we exhaust IPv4 addresses and adopt IPv6 at increasingly faster rates. The meta-issues the committee hopes to explore include:
  • How broadly is IPv6 transport supported by commercial firewalls?
  • Is IPv6 support available from commercial firewalls for all market segments?
  • Which commonly used security enforcement features can be deployed from commercial firewalls when IPv6 transport is used?
  • Can an organization enforce a security policy from commercial firewalls when using IPv6 that is commensurate to a policy currently supported when IPv4 is used?
The formal public announcement for the survey is posted at ICANN here.

Vendors of commercial firewalls and business users are invited to participate in the survey online here.

Posted at 11:44 AM in All matters security |

Tags: firewall, ICANN, IPv4, IPv6

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Find me on Mastodon and Facebook

Spotlight Posts

  • New study: Cybercrime Supply Chain 2023
    Today, my Interisle colleagues and I released a study, Cybercrime Supply Chain 2023: Measurements and Assessments of Cyber Attack Resources and Where Criminals Acquire Them. Criminals who perpetrate malware, spam, phishing and other serious cybercrimes enjoy an enormous economic advantage over defenders and responders. They can acquire resources from an online cybercrime supply chain where everything from phishing kits and malicious software, email lists and mobile numbers, domain names and Internet addresses, and places to host attacks are all readily and cheaply available. Our report examines these supply chains. We examined over 10M reports collected at the Cybercrime Information Center...
  • Interisle study reveals that phishing attacks have tripled since May 2020, situation worsening each year
    My colleagues at Interisle Consulting Group and I today announced the publication of an industry report, Phishing Landscape 2023, A Study of the Scope and Distribution of Phishing. We analyzed more than 11 million phishing reports collected from 1 May 2020 to 30 April 2023 to provide annual and triennial measurements of phishing. Our study identifies distinct, persistent exploitation and abuse of Internet resources, reveals that criminals can trivially acquire everything they need to phish. Among the major findings in the study, Interisle reports that: The number of phishing attacks has tripled since May 2020, and has increased 65% over...
  • FTC's proposed Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses is important for #infosec
    M3AAWG comments on the FTC's proposed rule Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses is available. I was one of the contributors to the comment. In the comment, M3AAWG "suggests additional regulatory solutions and best practices to complement the goals of this rule, such as clarifying the scope of the rule to include the use of domain names in impersonation schemes and the use of technologies that enable impersonation" and the important role that Whois plays in investigating impersonation and fraud. Several reports that my Interisle colleagues and I published are cited in the comment, along with the...
  • Cybercrime Information Center reports sharp increases in phishing attacks, unique domains reported in August-October 2022 time period
    A recent ebb in domain names reported for phishing created some euphoria in the domain industry. With phishing activity, as with tides, ebbs are invariably followed by flows. In their August- October 2022 Quarterly Phishing Activity, the Cybercrime Information Center observed a 40% increase in phishing attacks and a nearly 20% increase in unique domain names reported for phishing.
  • Cybercrime Information Center's YouTube Channel
    My colleagues and I at Interisle have created a YouTube channel to complement the quarterly reporting and studies of cybercrime we host at the Cybercrime Information Center. Our goal is to share, in a few minutes, the findings and insights from our research in a format that's easily accessible and shareable, informative, and entertaining. The inaugural videos provide 2-5 minute summaries of our annual Phishing and Malware Landscape studies. We'll continue to produce videos of our annual studies. If you like what you see, leave us a comment.

Search

My Photo

Categories